I spent hours reading that post and what I got from it was that the different parts of the world, England, Northern Europe, Southern Europe, and USA/Canada have tried to keep closely to the type, but each area has changed a little with respect to style (that being elegant rather than substantial in build) and in some of the countries they have eliminated the word elegance from the standard and are therefore breeding a more substantial dog (more substance less refinement. If you read through the 18 some odd pages, she points out the good and bad points of each country or regions dogs. She says the English dogs have longer coats and looser skin, some have droopy eyes because of heavy jowls, etc. (she points this out as a flaw they are working to correct). There's a bunch of other stuff too, but basically she says we should all adhere to the type in the standard and try and stay away from what's the style that currently winning. As an All Breed world-wide judge her point was that we should all continue to follow the standard and not wind up creating diverent classes for boxers.
